It has been marvelously funny reading the comments defending ‘Two Citations’ Craig on my latest vid. The superficial nature of these comments can maybe best highlighted by this hypothetical.
IF I had put up a video as ‘a professional scientist’ saying how Craig MIGHT be a good philosopher, but is merely a layman when it comes to science, and that as a professional scientist I find his arguments very unsophisticated and frankly embarrassing. (all in an insipidly smug patronizing tone)
Who seriously believes that these exact same people would have NOT gone absolutely ballistic highlighting the exact same problems with the vacuous nature of these arguments that I did. Damn, I’m almost tempted to do it, yknow as one of those ‘Double-Check and Mate, sucker’ type moves.
Anyways, it clearly got under the skin of these people to have it highlighted that their ‘leading academic’ has a pathetic citaion record. Nothing bites like the truth eh boys!.. Which leads to the obvious question:
Tags: 5 pillars, academic, apologetics, apologist, argument, comic, cosmological, craig, funny, god, jesus, joke, kalam, lane, laugh, moral, philosopher, philosophy, poor, professional, religion, science, two citations. richard dawkins, willaim lane craig, william, wlc